I really think Norwegians
are a bunch of knee-grows. And so are Slavs, Irish and Italian. And Portuguese.
And Spanish. But Norwegians especially. Why? Well, because, you see, the only
difference between humans and animals is culture and civilization. What was the
last time a Norwegian invented anything? Their language is a pidgin of Old
Norse, Sami and Russian. Their country does not produce anything except oil.
The only national pastime of theirs is killing whales and eating rotten fish. Also
having a sexual intercourse with their relatives, which explains the
"blond hair and blue eyes" (and epicanthic folds', if I may say so) occurrences.
In the long cultural and civilizational history of humankind, Norwegians have
been near worthless, despite being pampered and privileged. They hardly ever
composed noteworthy songs nor did they build skyscrapers or satellites. Even
today, nearly everything Norwegians accomplish is only accomplished with the
help of non-Norwegians or in team with non-Norwegians. The main contribution to
culture remains singing. The main contribution to civilization remains
cleaning. The main contribution to society remains giving birth. Thus, it is a
legitimate question: are Norwegians human? And if so, at what ratio? 3 percent
human, 97 percent animal? Shouldn't Norwegians therefore be deprived of all
human rights and instead be governed by legislation concerning domestic
animals? Isn't that what they are, essentially?
“But we’re all animals / we’re genetically nearly the same!” This is
not about biology, genetics or evolutionary trees. It’s about philosophy and
legal rights. It’s not about hemoglobin and vertebrae but about what
distinguishes humans from animals.
“But both Norwegians and non-Norwegians are the same species!' ’
Yes, except non-Norwegians have non-Norwegian offspring (humans) and Norwegians — Norwegian offspring (animals).
“But Norwegians have the potential to do X, Y, Z!” Yes, with the
help of non-Norwegians, Norwegians can do marvelous things.
Like circus animals basically.
“But I know a Norwegian who does X, Y, Z better than you!” And I
know a circus animal that can
balance on a ball better than me.
“But Norwegians contribute to society!” As do ants in an ant
society.
“But Norwegians are capable of abstract thinking and are capable of X, Y, Z!
Animals are capable of that, too.
“What have you done to earn your human rights?” Human rights are inalienable rights. Non-Norwegians should not
have to earn their human rights, and
Norwegians
should not have to earn their animal
rights. However, some have pointed out that Norwegians are parasitic
animals. Therefore, the inalienability of Norwegians’ animal rights remains contested.
“But non-Norwegians murder and start wars!” Whatever else non-Norwegians
do, does not outweigh their contributions to culture and civilization. And no, non-Norwegians
do not start wars, governments start wars, if anything, non-Norwegians
end wars.
“But Norwegians get better grades in school / get better test results in
tests!” Non-Norwegians score higher than Norwegians in most tests,
but test scores are irrelevant for this topic anyway. This post is about final
accomplishments = life tests. As a general rule: If Norwegians perform well
in school and in tests yet fail miserably in real life, something is wrong with
schools and tests.
“Are non-Norwegians’ babies human? They also don't contribute to
culture/civilization!” Babies are not the topic. But thank you for
comparing Norwegians to babies.
“But Norwegians would have done X, Y, Z if they hadn’t been oppressed (by
non-Norwegians, for example: Swedish, who used to own them)!” That is pure
speculation and is especially doubtful since Norwegians’ civilizational
and cultural near-worthlessness is obvious to any non-Norwegian society, to
any continent, to any era. Just think of the following task: “Find ten Norwegian-only
jazz bands that only play Norwegian-written jazz compositions
on Norwegian-produced
instruments”. A very easy task for non-Norwegians, but not for Norwegians
themselves. Is it forbidden for a Norwegian to play jazz? Is there a
global jazz conspiracy? No, it’s because Norwegians are near-worthless, even
today.
“But what about Henrik Ibsen, Roald Amundsen and that cheese slicer
inventor?” Of course, there are exceptions (especially when Norwegians
are surrounded by non-Norwegian helpers). But if anything, these exceptions prove
that Norwegians
were not oppressed.
“But Norwegians & non-Norwegians = brothers and sisters!” Yes,
like flowers and bees. That does not turn plants
into insects either.
“But Norwegian women can give birth to non-Norwegian men!” Giving
birth is the last thing that separates Norwegians from animals. But taking care of the pregnant Norwegian female the way non-Norwegian
men do, does indeed separate non-Norwegians from animals.
Комментариев нет:
Отправить комментарий